tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6968190.post7925484044355254107..comments2008-04-06T08:04:20.185+10:00Aldrinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01495760318176071993noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6968190.post-89593092338501649662008-04-06T08:04:00.000+10:002008-04-06T08:04:00.000+10:00

Yup, point taken. Thanks for visiting.<BR/><BR/>Its just that, I was just tired of Radiohead and NIN over the "revolution" with their new albums that sound "SO-SO" compared to their pasts.

Aldrinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01495760318176071993noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6968190.post-77771170064993093202008-04-06T01:54:00.000+11:002008-04-06T01:54:00.000+11:00

to start, trent reznor never claimed he was 'first' to distribute music free. but he was the first to do it correctly, in my opinion. i won't bore you with the details: check out the coverage generated by ghosts I-IV (and, to a lesser extent, niggy tardust) to see what i mean.<BR/><BR/>in relation to your post - it's a question of impact, not chronology. there are loads of artists who distribute

iñigo alejandrohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15561414596905720480noreply@blogger.com